The Great Batik Fraud: Beware of False Heritage When It Enters the Market!




Image by Dewan Budaya


Source: New Straits Times


The threat to Malaysia's rich batik legacy comes from imitated more than a lack of appreciation. According to a recent report, fake batik is increasing in local marketplaces, particularly from overseas vendors who pass off mass-produced patterns as "authentic Malaysian batik."

This is a smack in the face to local craftspeople and a violation of intellectual property, in addition to being a cultural insult. The New Straits Times claims that these knockoff goods, which are frequently imported from China and Indonesia, are sold as authentic Malaysian batik, misleading customers and diminishing the value of genuine craftsmanship.

In contrast to batik that is hand-drawn or block-printed, which requires traditional artistry and skills, many of these products are digitally printed fabrics that have nothing to do with Malaysia's cultural heritage. Despite undercutting legitimate makers, they are used at government and corporate functions, sold at local bazaars, and even marketed online.

The worst part is that there is now no particular rule in Malaysia to prevent the usage of the term "batik," even though there are obvious ethical and legal concerns. While genuine artists fight for recognition and fair pricing, opportunists are able to take advantage of the brand due to this legal ambiguity.

This situation is screaming for change. For local artists to maintain their cultural and financial worth, they require robust copyright enforcement and legal protection. Batik artists deserve to see counterfeiters held responsible, same as media companies target unlawful streaming.


My comment :


There is cultural piracy, and in the case of batik, it is occurring right in front of our eyes. If you are in business, especially in the tourism or fashion industries, avoid contributing to the issue. Recognize the source of your materials and make use of vetted local vendors as this could help contribute and encourage the original inventors. In addition to being the moral thing to do, it could spare you legal trouble when Malaysia eventually takes copyright enforcement seriously in this field.


-Afiqah Nazurah-

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Syamsul Yusof win appeal in "Aku Bohsia" copyright suit

Image
Image sources: New Straits Times Sources: Malayan Law Journal , MalayMail (1) , MalayMail (2) and Linkedin  On November 24, 2014, Elias Idris, a writer of the novel Aku Bohsia, claimed that the movie Bohsia: Jangan Pilih Jalan Hitam directed by Syamsul Yusof had many similarities with his story and had copied his work. Elias filed a copyright lawsuit against Yusof Md Aslam (the producer), Syamsul Yusof (actor-director), and Skop Production (film production). He claimed the movie, released in 2009, shared similar plot, character, and message with his novel published in 1995.  However, the defendants, Yusof, Syamsul, and Skop Production are argued they had never seen or read the novel. They said any similarities were just coincidence, as the issue of "bohsia" is a common social problem. They also filed a countersuit against Elias over defamatory articles posted on his blog on November 7 and 16, 2014. The High Court ruled in favour of the defendants and ordered Elias to pay RM1...
Read more

Taylor Swift’s Re-Recordings: A Lesson in Copyright and Control

Image
PICTURES BY JOHN SHEARER / GETTY IMAGES Source: Harvard Law Today Most of us have heard the name Taylor Swift, whether you’re a fan or not it is no debate that she is one of the biggest pop stars known globally. However, did you know that she is involved in a very interesting copyright-related issue specifically in the topic of intellectual property?  On April 9 2021, Taylor Swift released her first re-recording of one of her old albums titled Fearless (Taylor’s Version). On the surface, people might wonder what is the reason for the release if the former version was already a successful money maker, well first let’s look at how it all started. Taylor Swift was originally signed to a record label named Big Machine since debut, she then recorded 6 albums total all of them being multi million sellers. In 2018 she left the company but afterwards Big Machine was bought by Scooter Braun. He then sold the company including Taylor’s albums that was owned by them to another company named ...
Read more